SynthesisAnnals of botany2025
A systematic review suggests extension and redefinition of a food-deception pollination syndrome involving anautogenous flies.
Synthesis in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Floral Scents of DeceptiveEcology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe currently recognized diversity of pollination strategies requires pollination syndromes to be updated. Described a decade ago, kleptomyiophily is a deceptive pollination system in which plants exploit the nutrient-seeking behaviour of females of kleptoparasitic flies (Chloropidae and Milichiidae) by olfactorily mimicking their insect host. Such a pollination system was already hypothesized for pollination by biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) but has never been formalized. This review aims to explore the extent of pollination interactions deceiving anautogenous flies, especially by considering pollination by biting midges and kleptomyiophily as two facets of a common pollination syndrome: insect-host mimicry. Given that attraction of these flies seems to rely on insect-mimicking volatile organic compounds (VOCs), we propose an overview of the floral odours emitted by these plant species.
methodsWe compiled bibliographic data on plant species pollinated by Chloropidae, Ceratopogonidae and Milichiidae, to list plant species that could be involved in insect-host mimicry pollination strategies. Then, we reanalysed data from the literature on floral VOCs of 18 of these plant species distributed among four plant families and compared them with related plant species performing brood-site mimicry, the pollination syndrome closest to insect-host mimicry.
resultsWe show that 97 plant species from seven families are mainly pollinated by Chloropidae, Ceratopogonidae and Milichiidae, with almost exclusively females found in flowers. Deception of anautogenous flies has been shown for only four plant species but has been supposed for a total of 28 others. Comparison of floral VOCs shows significant differences between insect-host mimicry and brood-site mimicry in terms of chemical composition, diversity and models mimicked.
conclusionsDespite fragmentary knowledge about the biology of the Diptera involved in insect-host mimicry, our results show similarities in floral odours and the putative mimicked resource between kleptomyiophilous plants and those pollinated by biting midges, emphasizing a broader, unique, pollination syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.