Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847414›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Applications of Large Language Models in the Field of Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review.

Glenn Holmes, Biya Tang, Sunil Gupta, Svetha Venkatesh, Helen Christensen, Alexis Whitton

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Urgent considerations for suicide prevention in the safe and ethical use of artificial intelligence.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glenn HolmesBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-5522
Biya TangBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7425-3295
Sunil GuptaApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3308-1930
Svetha VenkateshApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-6631
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065
Alexis WhittonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Randwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-2172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevention of suicide is a global health priority. Approximately 800,000 individuals die by suicide yearly, and for every suicide death, there are another 20 estimated suicide attempts. Large language models (LLMs) hold the potential to enhance scalable, accessible, and affordable digital services for suicide prevention and self-harm interventions. However, their use also raises clinical and ethical questions that require careful consideration.

objectiveThis scoping review aims to identify emergent trends in LLM applications in the field of suicide prevention and self-harm research. In addition, it summarizes key clinical and ethical considerations relevant to this nascent area of research.

methodsSearches were conducted in 4 databases (PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore) in February 2024. Eligible studies described the application of LLMs for suicide or self-harm prevention, detection, or management. English-language peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings were included, without date restrictions. Narrative synthesis was used to synthesize study characteristics, objectives, models, data sources, proposed clinical applications, and ethical considerations. This review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) standards.

resultsOf the 533 studies identified, 36 (6.8%) met the inclusion criteria. An additional 7 studies were identified through citation chaining, resulting in 43 studies for review. The studies showed a bifurcation of publication fields, with varying publication norms between computer science and mental health. While most of the studies (33/43, 77%) focused on identifying suicide risk, newer applications leveraging generative functions (eg, support, education, and training) are emerging. Social media was the most common source of LLM training data. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was the predominant model used, although generative pretrained transformers (GPTs) featured prominently in generative applications. Clinical LLM applications were reported in 60% (26/43) of the studies, often for suicide risk detection or as clinical assistance tools. Ethical considerations were reported in 33% (14/43) of the studies, with privacy, confidentiality, and consent strongly represented.

conclusionsThis evolving research area, bridging computer science and mental health, demands a multidisciplinary approach. While open access models and datasets will likely shape the field of suicide prevention, documenting their limitations and potential biases is crucial. High-quality training data are essential for refining these models and mitigating unwanted biases. Policies that address ethical concerns-particularly those related to privacy and security when using social media data-are imperative. Limitations include high variability across disciplines in how LLMs and study methodology are reported. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence signals a shift in approach, particularly in applications related to care, support, and education, such as improved crisis care and gatekeeper training methods, clinician copilot models, and improved educational practices. Ongoing human oversight-through human-in-the-loop testing or expert external validation-is essential for responsible development and use.

trial registrationOSF Registries osf.io/nckq7; https://osf.io/nckq7.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionHumansLarge Language ModelsSelf-Injurious BehaviorAIartificial intelligencelarge language modelPRISMAself-harmsuicidesuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID39847414
PMCPMC11809463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.