Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847375›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Explainable Deep Learning for Glaucomatous Visual Field Prediction: Artifact Correction Enhances Transformer Models.

Kornchanok Sriwatana, Chanon Puttanawarut, Yanin Suwan, Titipat Achakulvisut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kornchanok SriwatanaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Chanon PuttanawarutChakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.
Yanin SuwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Titipat AchakulvisutDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning approach that restores artifact-laden optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and predicts functional loss on the 24-2 Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) test. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study used 1674 visual field (VF)-OCT pairs from 951 eyes for training and 429 pairs from 345 eyes for testing. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness map artifacts were corrected using a generative diffusion model. Three convolutional neural networks and 2 transformer-based models were trained on original and artifact-corrected datasets to estimate 54 sensitivity thresholds of the 24-2 HVF test. Results: Predictive performances were calculated using root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), with explainability evaluated through GradCAM, attention maps, and dimensionality reduction techniques. The Distillation with No Labels (DINO) Vision Transformers (ViT) trained on artifact-corrected datasets achieved the highest accuracy (RMSE, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.44, 95% CI = 4.07, 4.82 decibel [dB], MAE = 3.46, 95% CI = 3.14, 3.79 dB), and the greatest interpretability, showing improvements of 0.15 dB in global RMSE and MAE (P < 0.05) compared to the performance on original maps. Feature maps and visualization tools indicate that artifacts compromise DINO-ViT's predictive ability but improve with artifact correction. Conclusions: Combining self-supervised ViTs with generative artifact correction enhances the correlation between glaucomatous structures and functions. Translational Relevance: Our approach offers a comprehensive tool for glaucoma management, facilitates the exploration of structure-function correlations in research, and underscores the importance of addressing artifacts in the clinical interpretation of OCT.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDeep LearningGlaucomaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual FieldsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetinal Ganglion CellsRetrospective StudiesVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID39847375
PMCPMC11758932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.