ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025
Inflammation and Occlusive Retinal Vasculitis Post Faricimab.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of faricimab secondary to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of intraocular inflammation following intravitreal faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a single-centre retrospective study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Clinical spectrum of intraocular inflammation following faricimab intravitreal injections: evidence from a large real-life cohort in the United Kingdom.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Intraocular inflammation incidence and real-world safety of intravitreal faricimab treatment across retinal indications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Intraocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of faricimab-a case series including one case of bilateral choroidal involvement.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Two-Years Real-World Experience of a Tertiary Center with Intravitreal Brolucizumab Switch for Treatment of Exudative Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Short-Term Outcomes of Three Consecutive Monthly Loading Administrations of Aflibercept 8 Mg for Treatment-Naïve Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Progress in the treatment of diabetic macular edema with faricimab: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Randomized clinical trials have shown the safety and efficacy of faricimab as a novel vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 inhibitor in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and macular edema of various etiologies. However, more rare adverse events may not be considered in clinical trials. Objective: To describe 3 eyes that developed irreversible vision loss following initial mild intraocular inflammation (IOI) to faricimab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series from a single academic tertiary referral center (University of Nebraska Medical Center) from October 2023 to August 2024 included 3 patients who developed occlusive retinal vasculitis (ORV) following an initial sensitization with intravitreal faricimab. Two eyes were being treated with faricimab for nAMD, and the other 2 eyes were treated for diabetic macular edema. Intervention: Patients exposed to faricimab after the prior development of mild IOI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical symptoms, signs, and clinical course of patients who were diagnosed with ORV following rechallenge with faricimab. Results: Mild IOI developed in 4 eyes following faricimab, and ORV developed in 3 eyes with repeated challenge. This resulted in profound, irreversible vision loss, despite treatment with topical and systemic steroids. In the eye that did not develop ORV following rechallenge, there have been no repeated adverse events despite restarting intravitreal faricimab injections. Conclusions and Relevance: Given these observations with repeated challenge, caution is advisable when using the same biologic after the development of even mild IOI with prior injection. It appears an immunological memory response is elicited with these repeated exposures, resulting in the development of ORV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.