Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847337›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Expert navigators deploy rational complexity-based decision precaching for large-scale real-world planning.

Pablo Fernandez Velasco, Eva-Maria Griesbauer, Iva K Brunec, Jeremy Morley, Ed Manley, Daniel C McNamee, Hugo J Spiers

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pablo Fernandez Velasco *Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7563-8170
Eva-Maria Griesbauer *Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9376-2439
Iva K BrunecDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Jeremy MorleyOrdnance Survey Ltd, Southampton SO16 0AS, United Kingdom.
Ed ManleySchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8904-0513
Daniel C McNamee *Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Research, Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal.
Hugo J Spiers *Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Academy (The British Academy) PFSS23\230053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient planning is a distinctive hallmark of intelligence in humans, who routinely make rapid inferences over complex world contexts. However, studies investigating how humans accomplish this tend to focus on naive participants engaged in simplistic tasks with small state spaces, which do not reflect the intricacy, ecological validity, and human specialization in real-world planning. In this study, we examine the street-by-street route planning of London taxi drivers navigating across more than 26,000 streets in London (United Kingdom). We explore how planning unfolded dynamically over different phases of journey construction and identify theoretic principles by which these expert human planners rationally precache decisions at prioritized environment states in an early phase of the planning process. In particular, we find that measures of path complexity predict human mental sampling prioritization dynamics independent of alternative measures derived from the real spatial context being navigated. Our data provide real-world evidence for complexity-driven remote state access within internal models and precaching during human expert route planning in very large structured spaces.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSpatial NavigationAdultFemaleHumansLondonMaleefficient planninghuman expertiselarge-scalenavigationreal-world

Identifiers

PMID39847337
PMCPMC11789086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.