Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847326›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Microfluidic purification of genomic DNA.

Jiayi Wang, Jason E Butler, Anthony J C Ladd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiayi WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0009-0001-6218-9203
Jason E ButlerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-9116
Anthony J C LaddDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-0650

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1804302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a microfluidic device to extract DNA from a cell lysate, without the need for centrifuges, magnetic beads, or gels. Instead, separation is driven by transverse migration of DNA, which occurs when a polyelectrolyte solution flowing through a microfluidic channel is subjected to an electric field. The coupling of the weak shearing with the axial electric field is highly selective for long, flexible, charged molecules, of which DNA is the sole example in a typical cell lysate. As a result of migration to the walls, DNA is held near the channel inlet by electrophoresis (there is no flow near the channel walls), while the remaining components are eluted by the much larger (at least 10-fold) convective flow. We have demonstrated the feasibility of the device by recovering up to 40 ng of purified DNA in less than 30 min from 10

Indexed as

DNAMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsAnimalsDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliDNADNA, BacterialDNA extractionelectrohydrodynamic separationmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID39847326
PMCPMC11789158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.