Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847258›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025

Challenges when Combining Expertise to Provide Integrated Care for Youth At-Risk and Their Family: A Qualitative Study.

Laura C M Veerman, Eva A Mulder, Robert R J M Vermeiren, Lieke van Domburgh, Anne van der Maas, Laura A Nooteboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura C M VeermanLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, Leiden, 2300 AA, the Netherlands. l.c.m.veerman@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-0410
Eva A MulderAcademic Collaborative Youth At-Risk, Post Box 53, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5906-5867
Robert R J M VermeirenLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, Leiden, 2300 AA, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-2207
Lieke van DomburghAcademic Collaborative Youth At-Risk, Post Box 53, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5149-2557
Anne van der MaasLokalis, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Laura A NooteboomLUMC Curium - Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, Leiden, 2300 AA, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-4863

Funding

ZonMw 70-74700-98-301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The needs of youth at-risk and their families, facing multiple problems and serious mental health issues, exceed the expertise and possibilities of a single stakeholder (professional, organization, municipality). These youngsters require care in which the expertise of different professionals and organizations is integrated. However, combining various types of expertise to provide integrated care to youth at-risk is challenging. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to describe how stakeholders approach these challenges when combining different types of expertise to provide integrated care for youth at-risk. In total, 28 in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders working in various organizations or municipalities for youth at-risk in The Netherlands. Transcripts were analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. Reflections from a youth representative were also incorporated. Results reveal challenges at four levels: youth and family, professional, organization, and system. At each level, challenges arise in addressing the exceptional needs and problems of youth at-risk, collaborating with multiple stakeholders, reluctance to apply or involve expertise, and finding sufficient resources to combine expertise. Professionals, organizations, and municipalities approach these challenges with a backward or forward approach: either they accept the situation, focus on their own expertise, leave responsibility to others; or they force their expertise on others, or seek collaboration to combine expertise. Overall, combining different types of expertise to provide integrated care to youth at-risk can be seen as an expertise in itself, and necessitates reflection, awareness, and careful consideration from all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedFamilyMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationExpertiseFamiliesIntegrated careMental healthQualitative studyYouth at-risk

Identifiers

PMID39847258
PMCPMC12133975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.