Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847254›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025

Development and Validation of a Decision Support Tool for Baby Formula Prescription.

Leonara Carla de Araújo Pereira, Gabrielle Mahara Martins Azevêdo Castro, Anna Cecília Queiroz de Medeiros

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonara Carla de Araújo PereiraUniversity Hospital Ana Bezerra, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8391-382X
Gabrielle Mahara Martins Azevêdo CastroUniversity Hospital Ana Bezerra, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-5150
Anna Cecília Queiroz de MedeirosPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Santa Cruz, Brazil. anna.queiroz@ufrn.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7664-4959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough there are acceptable medical reasons for the use of food supplements, most prescriptions for newborns do not comply with current recommendations, putting continued breastfeeding at risk. This study aimed to create and validate a flowchart for newborn supplement prescription.

methodsThe flowchart was created and submitted to two rounds of assessments by a panel of judges, who calculated the content validity index (CVI) (acceptable > 0.80). Flowchart use in clinical practice (applicability) was validated by professional prescribers through the resolution of 3 clinical cases. Data were analyzed using Pearson`s chi-squared test (p < 0.05).

resultsThe flowchart was assessed by 17 judges and validated regarding its content (CVI = 0.84). Took part in validating the applicability of this study 169 doctors and nutritionists who work in maternal and child health. There was a statistical association between correct case resolution and flowchart utilization in two of the three clinical cases (p < 0.05). In situation 1, the use of a validated flowchart increased the likelihood of correct answers 7.76 times. DISCUSSION: Prescribing baby formula is complex and requires careful assessment of several factors. Thus, knowledge translation is an effective intervention to eliminate the gaps between knowledge and clinical practice. The validated flowchart allows more assertive conduct regarding breastfeeding management and food supplement prescription for newborns.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesInfant FormulaBreast FeedingDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornReproducibility of ResultsBreastfeedingClinical decision makingComplementary feedingInfant formula

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.