Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847251›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2025

Antibiotics for Paediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia: What is the Optimal Course Duration?

Hing Cheong Kok, Anne B Chang, Siew Moy Fong, Gabrielle B McCallum, Stephanie T Yerkovich, Keith Grimwood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Development of a predictive model for severeZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hing Cheong KokChild and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia. hingcheong.kok@menzies.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9781-5905
Anne B ChangChild and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Siew Moy FongDepartment of Paediatrics, Sabah Women and Children's Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Gabrielle B McCallumChild and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Stephanie T YerkovichChild and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Keith GrimwoodChild and Maternal Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant global reductions in cases of pneumonia during the last 3 decades, pneumonia remains the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality in children aged <5 years. Beyond the immediate disease burden it imposes, pneumonia contributes to long-term morbidity, including lung function deficits and bronchiectasis. Viruses are the most common cause of childhood pneumonia, but bacteria also play a crucial role. However, the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia remains uncertain in both low- and middle-income countries and in high-income countries. Knowing the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for pneumonia is crucial for effective antimicrobial stewardship. This is especially important as concerns mount over rising antibiotic resistance in respiratory bacterial pathogens, which increases the risk of treatment failure. Numerous studies have focused on the duration of oral antibiotics and short-term outcomes, such as clinical cure and mortality. In contrast, only one study has examined both intravenous and oral antibiotics and their impact on long-term respiratory outcomes following pneumonia hospitalisation. However, study findings may be influenced by their inclusion criteria when children unlikely to have bacterial pneumonia are included. Efforts to differentiate between bacterial and non-bacterial pneumonia continue, but a validated, accurate, and simple point-of-care diagnostic test remains elusive. Without certainty that a child has bacterial pneumonia, determining the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment is challenging. This review examines the evidence for the recommended duration of antibiotics for treating uncomplicated pneumonia in otherwise healthy children and concludes that the question of duration is unresolved.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsPneumoniaPneumonia, BacterialChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired PneumoniaHumansInfantAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID39847251
PMCPMC12031807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.