ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2025
Updates on CAD risk assessment: using the coronary artery calcium score in combination with traditional risk factors.
Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rat models for arterial calcification associated with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Diet patterns are associated with progression of coronary artery calcification and differ across race/ethnicity: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Integrating Conventional and Emerging Approaches in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management.Public health challenges · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, so prevention and early diagnosis play important roles to reduce mortality and morbidity. Traditional risk-score assessments were used to find the at-risk patients in order to prevent or early treatment of CAD. Adding imaging data to traditional risk-score systems will able us to find these patients more confidently and reduce the probable mismanagements. MAIN TEXT: Measuring the vascular calcification by coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can prepare valuable data for this purpose. Using CAC became more popular in recent years. The most applicable method to evaluate CAC is Agatston scoring using computed tomography (CT) scanning. Patients are classified into several subgroups: no evidence of CAD (score 0), mild CAD (score 1-10), minimal CAD (score 11-100), moderate CAD (score 101-400), and severe CAD (score > 400) and higher than1000 as the extreme risk of CVD events.
conclusionsCAC assessment was recommended in the patients older than 40 years old with CAD risk factors, the ones with stable angina, borderline-to-intermediate-risk group, etc. According to the results of the CAC the patients may be candidate for further evaluation for needing revascularization, medical treatment, or routine follow-up. Adding artificial intelligence (AI) to CAC will prepare more data and can increase the reliability of our approach to the patients promising a bright future to improve this technology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.