ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025
Trends in Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Duration HIPEC-Mimetic Mithramycin A Exposure Induces Durable Transcriptional Remodeling Involving Chromatin Regulatory Networks in Colorectal Cancer Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Literature reviews: typology and forensic applications.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
- Trends and visualization analysis of research on MASLD-Related hepatocellular carcinoma: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) stands as the third most prevalent malignancy globally and is recognized as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Notably, nearly 50% of individuals diagnosed with CRC ultimately develop metastatic disease, with the peritoneum emerging as the second most frequent site for metastatic spread. Recent advancements in therapeutic frameworks have enhanced both survival rates and quality of life metrics for patients afflicted with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRCPM).
objectiveThis study endeavors to facilitate an in-depth review of the current scientific landscape surrounding CRCPM, ultimately aiming to delineate future avenues for investigative research in this realm.
methodsEmploying R software through the Bibliometrix package, alongside analytical tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer, we performed a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. This enabled us to assess pivotal keywords, prominent authors, influential countries, notable institutions, relevant literature, and key journals pertinent to the field of CRCPM research.
resultsOur findings illustrate a significant uptick in the volume of publications addressing CRCPM, with the USA leading in overall contribution, complemented by substantial input from distinguished scholars in the Netherlands and France. The author Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh emerged as the most prolific contributor. Current research endeavors have predominantly focused on the characterization of primary malignancies with peritoneal metastases, therapeutic interventions for CRCPM, and the orchestration of clinical trials.
conclusionThis analysis culminates in a systematic encapsulation of the prevailing research findings concerning CRCPM, underscoring current hotspots and predicting future trends within the global research spectrum. The exploration of treatment modalities for CRCPM remains vibrant, and ongoing multicenter clinical trials are anticipated to further enrich our understanding and management of this challenging clinical issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39847239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.