ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2025
Occupational histories in neuropathologically confirmed multiple system atrophy.
Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple system atrophy: cure and care.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examined occupational histories in multiple system atrophy to identify environmental associations of potential relevance to disease causation.
methodsA total of 270 neuropathologically confirmed cases of multiple system atrophy obtained from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank for neurodegenerative disorders in Jacksonville, Florida, were included in this case-control study. Demographic and disease information was collected from medical records. Information regarding occupational history was collected retrospectively from medical records and published obituaries. Proportions of employment by occupational sector were compared with US census data.
resultsWhen comparing patients with US census data, significant differences were identified for education (15.2% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001), administration (14.8% versus 4.1%, P < 0.001), clerical (10.7% versus 5.5%, P = 0.001), petroleum industry (8.9% versus 5.6%, P = 0.024), metal industry (7.8% versus 3.0%, P < 0.001), electrical engineers and electricians (5.6% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001), civil or mechanical engineering (4.4% versus 0.2%, P < 0.001), real estate (4.4% versus 0.7%, P < 0.001), information technology (4.1% versus 1.8%, P = 0.011), woodworking (3.0% versus 0.03%, P < 0.001), writing or publishing (2.6% versus 0.3%, P < 0.001), law (2.2% versus 0.4%, P = 0.001), hairdressing (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.03), and social work (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.03).
conclusionsThe listed occupational categories were significantly overrepresented in our series of patients with multiple system atrophy as compared with population data. We hypothesize that these occupational associations may signify environmental exposures, increasing the disease risk in genetically susceptible individuals. We cannot exclude a potential selection bias in patients willing to donate their brains to an academic center to contribute to scientific knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39847196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.