ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Assessment of the transscleral removal technique for subretinal proliferative tissues during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo provide insights into the transscleral removal technique for subretinal proliferative tissues (SRP). STUDY
designRetrospective, single-center case series.
methodsPatients who underwent transscleral removal of SRP during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) were included. The preoperative RRD extent, SRP distribution, intraoperative maneuvers, complications, and surgical outcomes were assessed.
resultsSeven eyes of seven patients were enrolled for surgery. The RRD extent involved four quadrants in two eyes, three quadrants in three eyes, and two quadrants in the remaining two eyes. SRP were widely distributed beneath the detached retina in all the cases, with submacular SRP present in six cases. In these six cases, all the SRP, including the submacular SRP, could be removed without creating retinotomies via 1 or 2 subretinal trocars. However, peripheral SRP with extensive and strong adhesion to the retina required multiple retinotomies and conventional bimanual removal in one case. Surgical failure, attributable to the transscleral technique, occurred in one case due to a missed retinal puncture that occurred during subretinal trocar insertion, resulting in recurrent RRD. This patient had RRD within two quadrants, and the subretinal space could not be adequately dilated before insertion. All the patients had achieved retinal reattachment without deterioration of visual acuity at the final follow-up visit.
conclusionThe transscleral removal technique was suitable for the removal of SRP, including the posterior pole area, with minimal retinal damage. However, this technique may not be appropriate for SRP removal with extensive and strong adhesions or for cases with relatively nonextensive RRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39847184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.