Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Two-year randomized controlled trial of circumferential versus segmental ab externo angle surgery in patients with primary open angle glaucoma.
Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the surgical outcomes of visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy (VCST) and rigid probe segmental viscotrabeculotomy (VT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). STUDY
designA prospective randomized controlled study. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients presenting with POAG and operated upon in Mansoura Ophthalmic Center in Mansoura, Egypt between February 2017 and September 2021 were enrolled. Study eyes were randomized to either VCST or VT and follow up extended for 24 months. Success was defined as an intra ocular pressure (IOP)≤18 mmHg with a 40% reduction from baseline. Complications were noted.
resultsThe study enrolled 166 (82 in the circumferential group) eyes of 107 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in any demographic or preoperative clinical characteristics. The IOP trend demonstrated marked initial reduction (from 32.3±2.4 and 31.8±2.6 mmHg preoperatively in VCST and VT groups respectively) followed by a slow gradual rise over subsequent follow-up settling at lower IOP values in the circumferential (12.4±1.2 mmHg) than in the segmental group (15.5±0.9 mmHg) (p<0.001), both settling at significantly lower levels than preoperative values. The survival curve demonstrates complete success rates at 12, 15, 18, and 24 months were 98.8%, 96.4%, 95.1%, and 85.4% in the circumferential group and 98.8%, 92.9%, 91.7%, 79.8% in the segmental group respectively. Minimal self-limiting hyphema was universal in all study eyes.
conclusionsAngle procedures -segmental and circumferential- are effective in lowering the IOP for at least 2 years in eyes with POAG, with circumferential angle surgery providing a greater reduction of IOP and requiring fewer subsequent glaucoma procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.