Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847149›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

Determination of the Time-frequency Features for Impulse Components in EEG Signals.

Natalia Filimonova, Maria Specovius-Neugebauer, Elfriede Friedmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia FilimonovaBiology and Medicine Institute Science Educational Center, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Volodymyrska St, 60, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine.
Maria Specovius-NeugebauerInstitute of Mathematics, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, Kassel, 34132, Germany.
Elfriede FriedmannInstitute of Mathematics, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, Kassel, 34132, Germany. friedmann@mathematik.uni-kassel.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RTG 2749Universität Kassel BiTWerk
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately identifying the timing and frequency characteristics of impulse components in EEG signals is essential but limited by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Inspired by the visual system's ability to identify objects and their locations, we propose a new method that integrates a visual system model with wavelet analysis to calculate both time and frequency features of local impulses in EEG signals. We develop a mathematical model based on invariant pattern recognition by the visual system, combined with wavelet analysis using Krawtchouk functions as the mother wavelet. Our method precisely identifies the localization and frequency characteristics of the impulse components in EEG signals. Tested on task-related EEG data, it accurately detected blink components (0.5 to 1 Hz) and separated muscle artifacts (16 Hz). It also identified muscle response durations (298 ms) within the 1 to 31 Hz range in emotional reaction studies, offering insights into both individual and typical emotional responses. We further illustrated how the new method circumvents the uncertainty principle in low-frequency wavelet analysis. Unlike classical wavelet analysis, our method provides spectral characteristics of EEG impulses invariant to time shifts, improving the identification and classification of EEG components.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsArtifactsBlinkingFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsWavelet AnalysisYoung AdultEEG processingKrawtchouk functionsVisual systemWavelet analysis

Identifiers

PMID39847149
PMCPMC11757888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.