ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence features in choroidal and retinal tumors.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Choroidal melanoma edge recurrence 13 years after IAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was todescribe the clinical features, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging in patients with choroidal and retinal tumors. Ninety eyes of 89 patients with treatment-naive macular, midperipheral, and juxtapapillary choroidal and retinal tumors were retrospectively included in the study. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, B-mode ultrasonography, OCT, and FAF imaging. OCT and FAF images taken at the time of diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively. Choroidal nevus (CN), choroidal malignant melanoma (CMM), optic disc melanocytoma (ODM), circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH), and choroidal osteoma (CO) displayed dome-shaped contour on OCT, while choroidal metastases (CM) showed a lumpy bumpy contour. CN had preserved choriocapillaris. Choroidal compression was observed in all choroidal tumors except CCH which showed vascular expansion. CMM was the most common lesion displaying overlying lipofuscin. Intraretinal fluid was seen mostly in CCM and CCH. Subretinal fluid (SRF) was usually observed in CM, CMM, and CCH. Drusen and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were noted in CN. While the pattern of hyperautofluorescence (hyper-AF) was most marked in CMM, other tumors including CCH and CM occasionally showed similar FAF appearance. Comparing CN and CMM; CN displayed more drusen and PED (p = 0.024 and p = 0.037 respectively) and CMM showed more SRF, intraretinal fluid, and shaggy photoreceptor (p = 0.040, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively). CN displayed more hypo-AF and iso-AF (p < 0.001) while CMM showed significantly more diffuse and patchy hyper-AF (p < 0.001). Characteristic findings in OCT and FAF guide clinicians in the differential diagnosis of choroidal and retinal tumors and allow for earlier detection and improved treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39847119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.