Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39847119›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2025

Optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence features in choroidal and retinal tumors.

Gökçen Özcan, Taha Berkan Başer, Ahmet Kaan Gündüz, Furkan Başer, Huban Atilla

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Choroidal melanoma edge recurrence 13 years after IAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gökçen ÖzcanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Polatlı Duatepe State Hospital, Ophtalmology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. drgokcencondu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-5941
Taha Berkan BaşerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-1405
Ahmet Kaan GündüzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-5657
Furkan BaşerDepartment of Actuarial Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-5527
Huban AtillaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-3317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was todescribe the clinical features, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging in patients with choroidal and retinal tumors. Ninety eyes of 89 patients with treatment-naive macular, midperipheral, and juxtapapillary choroidal and retinal tumors were retrospectively included in the study. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, B-mode ultrasonography, OCT, and FAF imaging. OCT and FAF images taken at the time of diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively. Choroidal nevus (CN), choroidal malignant melanoma (CMM), optic disc melanocytoma (ODM), circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH), and choroidal osteoma (CO) displayed dome-shaped contour on OCT, while choroidal metastases (CM) showed a lumpy bumpy contour. CN had preserved choriocapillaris. Choroidal compression was observed in all choroidal tumors except CCH which showed vascular expansion. CMM was the most common lesion displaying overlying lipofuscin. Intraretinal fluid was seen mostly in CCM and CCH. Subretinal fluid (SRF) was usually observed in CM, CMM, and CCH. Drusen and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were noted in CN. While the pattern of hyperautofluorescence (hyper-AF) was most marked in CMM, other tumors including CCH and CM occasionally showed similar FAF appearance. Comparing CN and CMM; CN displayed more drusen and PED (p = 0.024 and p = 0.037 respectively) and CMM showed more SRF, intraretinal fluid, and shaggy photoreceptor (p = 0.040, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively). CN displayed more hypo-AF and iso-AF (p < 0.001) while CMM showed significantly more diffuse and patchy hyper-AF (p < 0.001). Characteristic findings in OCT and FAF guide clinicians in the differential diagnosis of choroidal and retinal tumors and allow for earlier detection and improved treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Choroid NeoplasmsFluorescein AngiographyRetinal NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleFundus OculiHemangiomaHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedOsteomaChoroidal malignant melanomaChoroidal nevusChoroidal tumorsFundus autofluorescenceOptical coherence tomographyRetinal tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.