ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) hazard assessment of the banned pesticides by the National Agency for Food and Drugs Administration and Control.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated risk prioritization of rubber additives based on hazard ranking and exposure characterization.Eco-Environment & Health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study carried out a quantitative structure-activity relationship hazard assessment of the banned pesticides in Nigeria with a view of identifying the dangers posed by these pesticides. Structure-activity relationships (SARs) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), which link a compound's chemical structure to its biological activity, can be used to create safer and more effective insecticides, prioritize chemicals for testing, and reduce the number of animal studies necessary throughout the regulatory process. The QSAR hazard assessment of the banned pesticides was carried out on the VEGA software. Environmental, (eco)toxicological, reproductive/developmental, body elimination half-life, and biodegradability models of human and ecological relevance were implemented within the VEGA software. The results predicted the different hazards associated with each of the banned pesticides. All of the banned pesticides have been predicted to be toxic to some or all of the evaluated endpoints. The studies predicted these pesticides to have potential of being mutagenic, carcinogenic, and/or toxic to the reproductive system and fetal development with different half-lives. The assessment further predicted most of these compounds to be non-biodegradable with tendencies to bioaccumulate in living things and the environment. It can be concluded that these pesticides have potential to cause harm to life and the environment. The use of these chemical compounds for domestic, industrial, and agricultural applications should be in accordance with the guideline of regulatory agencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39847056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.