ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2025
Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive (endoscopic/robotic) vs open thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid cancer.
Article in European thyroid journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of cisatracurium and rocuronium on intraoperative neuromonitoring and putuative mechanical trauma in 500 robotic baba thyroidectomies.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Progress and future prospects for the surgical treatment of permanent hypoparathyroidism after thyroid surgery: a narrative review.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Single-portAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Single-portAnnals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Selection between open thyroidectomy (OT) and minimally invasive (endoscopic/robotic) thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid cancer has been a subject of considerable debate. Comprehensive analysis of the short-term outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET), robotic-assisted thyroidectomy (RT) and open thyroidectomy (OT) for thyroid cancer using a large-scale dataset is important. Methods: This cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients receiving ET, RT or OT for thyroid cancer from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed among patients treated with ET, RT or OT to balance covariates distribution. This study involved single-institution patients (aged 18-70) who had undergone ET, RT or OT for thyroid cancer. Results: The study included 11,066 thyroid cancer patients (OT group- mean (SD) age: 42.45 (10.84) years; ET group- mean (SD) age: 36.75 (9.32) years and RT group- mean (SD) age: 40.27 (10.42) years). After PSM for demographic and clinical characteristics, 908 matched pairs of patients (ET vs OT) and 1480 matched pairs (RT vs OT) were included for further analysis. Complication analysis revealed that RT was associated with a lower rate of transient hypoparathyroidism (339 (22.9%) vs 687 (46.4%); P < 0.001), a lower rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism (4 (0.3%) vs 16 (1.1%); P = 0.012) and a lower rate of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (63 (4.3%) vs 89 (6.0%); P = 0.037). Conclusion: This cohort study analyzed the short-term outcomes between ET, RT and OT in a large sample of patients with thyroid cancer over a period of two decades. PSM provided a comparable cohort, and the results suggested the advantage of RT, which reduced Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ complications in the surgical treatment of thyroid cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.