Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39846848›Full record

ArticleMolecular nutrition & food research2025

Unlocking Probiotic Potential: Physicochemical Approaches to Evaluate Probiotic Bacterial Adhesion Potential to the Intestinal Tract.

Thị-Thanh-Trúc Phùng, Sébastien Dupont, Laurent Beney, Julie Chanut, Thomas Karbowiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thị-Thanh-Trúc PhùngL'institut Agro, Université Bourgogne Europe, INRAe, UMR PAM, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Sébastien DupontL'institut Agro, Université Bourgogne Europe, INRAe, UMR PAM, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Laurent BeneyL'institut Agro, Université Bourgogne Europe, INRAe, UMR PAM, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Julie ChanutL'institut Agro, Université Bourgogne Europe, INRAe, UMR PAM, Dijon, F-21000, France.
Thomas KarbowiakL'institut Agro, Université Bourgogne Europe, INRAe, UMR PAM, Dijon, F-21000, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4229-3003

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheCampus FranceConseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté ISITE BFC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial adhesion in the gut is critical to evaluate their effectiveness as probiotics. Understanding the bacterial adhesion within the complex gut environment is challenging. This study explores the adhesion mechanisms and the adhesion potential of five selected bacterial strains (Escherichia coli, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Faecalibacterium duncaniae, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis) at the initial stages when bacterial cells arriving in the gut, using different physicochemical approaches. Bacterial morphology, rheology, and surface properties were evaluated. Surprisingly, previous methods such as bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbon and the interfacial tension between bacterial suspensions and mineral oil did not fully capture the bacterial adhesion to intestinal mucus. Consequently, this study introduced a novel approach to assess bacterial adhesion to mucus, based on contact angle measurements, calculation of surface tension, and work of adhesion. Interestingly, both small and large intestinal mucus are rather hydrophilic, and thus highly hydrophilic bacteria such as E. coli and B. infantis tend to adhere better. Additionally, a multicriteria evaluation of bacterial adhesion to the gut, from the bulk liquid transport stage until the irreversible adhesion, was proposed. E. coli and B. infantis demonstrated the highest overall adhesion potential in the intestinal tract, followed by Lpb. plantarum, B. longum, and F. duncaniae, respectively. This work contributed original physicochemical approaches to comprehensively examine bacterial adhesion in the gut.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionIntestinesProbioticsBifidobacteriumEscherichia coliGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinal MucosaMucusRheologySurface Tensionbacterial adhesioncomprehensive evaluationgastrointestinal tractphysicochemical approachesprobioticssurface properties

Identifiers

PMID39846848
PMCPMC12410510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.