Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39846810›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

First-in-Human Phase I Study of a CD16A Bispecific Innate Cell Engager, AFM24, Targeting EGFR-Expressing Solid Tumors.

Anthony El-Khoueiry, Omar Saavedra, Jacob Thomas, Claire Livings, Elena Garralda, Gabriele Hintzen, Laura Kohlhas, Dessislava Vanosmael, Joachim Koch, Erich Rajkovic and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Immune cell engagers in lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The next generation of immunotherapies for lung cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Anthony El-KhoueiryNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9053-3841
Omar SaavedraVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-791X
Jacob ThomasNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8420-366X
Claire LivingsDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5196-6361
Elena GarraldaVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-7842
Gabriele HintzenAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-2545-2672
Laura KohlhasAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-4174-6871
Dessislava VanosmaelAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-6188-3250
Joachim KochAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-7509-6373
Erich RajkovicAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-4738-2194
Paulien RavenstijnAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-7443-5165
Paolo NuciforoVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1380-0990
Todd A FehnigerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-8705-2887
Mark FosterDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0009-0001-2683-7189
Melissa M Berrien-ElliottDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-7319-9159
Susanne WingertAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-3757-8221
Sina StäbleAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-2440
Daniela Morales-EspinosaAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0735-9134
Delcia RivasAffimed Inc., New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0001-4263-6352
Michael EmigAffimed GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-3775-7037
Juanita LopezDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8321-4212

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Targeting the Bone Marrow Microenvironment In Acute Lymphocytic LeukemiaP50CA171963 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel C Link · 2013 to 2026
$31.6M
TRANSLATING NK CELL BIOLOGY INTO CLINICAL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPYR01CA205239 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FEHNIGER, TODD A · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
Affimed GmbHNational Cancer Institute (NCI) P50CA171963NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P50 CA171963NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInnate immune cell-based therapies have shown promising antitumor activity against solid and hematologic malignancies. AFM24, a bispecific innate cell engager, binds CD16A on NK cells/macrophages and EGFR on tumor cells, redirecting antitumor activity toward tumors. The safety and tolerability of AFM24 were evaluated in this phase I/IIa dose-escalation/dose-expansion study in patients with recurrent or persistent, advanced solid tumors known to express EGFR. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe main objective in phase I was to determine the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during the observation period. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and pharmacokinetics.

resultsIn the dose-escalation phase, 35 patients received AFM24 weekly across seven dose cohorts (14-720 mg). One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 infusion-related reaction. Infusion-related reactions were mainly reported after the first infusion; these were manageable with premedication and a gradual increase in infusion rate. Pharmacokinetics was dose-proportional, and CD16A receptor occupancy on NK cells approached saturation between 320 and 480 mg. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses within the tumor. The best objective response was stable disease in 10/35 patients; four patients had stable disease for 4.3 to 7.1 months.

conclusionsAFM24 was well tolerated, with 480 mg established as the recommended phase II dose. AFM24 could be a novel therapy for patients with EGFR-expressing solid tumors, with suitable tolerability and appropriate pharmacokinetic properties for further development in combination with other immuno-oncology therapeutics.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificNeoplasmsReceptors, IgGAdultAgedErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansImmunity, InnateKiller Cells, NaturalMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, BispecificEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsFCGR3A protein, humanReceptors, IgG

Identifiers

PMID39846810
PMCPMC11964176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.