ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
First-in-Human Phase I Study of a CD16A Bispecific Innate Cell Engager, AFM24, Targeting EGFR-Expressing Solid Tumors.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- NK cell-mediated tumor cell killing by bispecific innate cell engagers induces ADCC-mediated activation of primary human dendritic cells.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Antibody Fc receptor CD16a mediates natural killer cell activation via mechanotransduction of piconewton forces.Science advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Pancreatic Cancer: Translating Tumor Biology into Actionability.Cancer discovery · 2026Review
- Targeting macrophage-driven NK cell immunosuppression to improve cancer immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Antibody Fc receptor CD16a mediates natural killer cell activation via mechanotransduction of piconewton forces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Current development and challenges of NK cell-based immunotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Immune cell engagers in lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Natural Killer Cell Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: From Preclinical Potentials to Clinical Applications and Combination Strategies.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Engineered natural killer cells for cancer therapy.Cancer cell · 2025Review
- Synergistic Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Modified FOLFIRINOX and NK Cell Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2025Article
- The next generation of immunotherapies for lung cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Fragment-Based Immune Cell Engager Antibodies in Treatment of Cancer, Infectious and Autoimmune Diseases: Lessons and Insights from Clinical and Translational Studies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The advantages of NK cell vaccines in solid carcinoma clinical trials: conducted by various biology strategy and technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInnate immune cell-based therapies have shown promising antitumor activity against solid and hematologic malignancies. AFM24, a bispecific innate cell engager, binds CD16A on NK cells/macrophages and EGFR on tumor cells, redirecting antitumor activity toward tumors. The safety and tolerability of AFM24 were evaluated in this phase I/IIa dose-escalation/dose-expansion study in patients with recurrent or persistent, advanced solid tumors known to express EGFR. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe main objective in phase I was to determine the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during the observation period. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and pharmacokinetics.
resultsIn the dose-escalation phase, 35 patients received AFM24 weekly across seven dose cohorts (14-720 mg). One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 infusion-related reaction. Infusion-related reactions were mainly reported after the first infusion; these were manageable with premedication and a gradual increase in infusion rate. Pharmacokinetics was dose-proportional, and CD16A receptor occupancy on NK cells approached saturation between 320 and 480 mg. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses within the tumor. The best objective response was stable disease in 10/35 patients; four patients had stable disease for 4.3 to 7.1 months.
conclusionsAFM24 was well tolerated, with 480 mg established as the recommended phase II dose. AFM24 could be a novel therapy for patients with EGFR-expressing solid tumors, with suitable tolerability and appropriate pharmacokinetic properties for further development in combination with other immuno-oncology therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.