ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of teicoplanin in paediatric patients, including those receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design Optimization for Developing Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Critically Ill Children: Application to Teicoplanin, Piperacillin and Meropenem.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Enhancing outcomes in pediatric populations with continuous renal replacement therapy: Current multidisciplinary strategies and innovations.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Teicoplanin Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Pediatric Populations: Age-Dependent Variability and Implications for Dose Optimization.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTeicoplanin is a commonly used antibiotic in critically ill children. However, teicoplanin dosing is often inaccurate, especially in children undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). This study aims to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to optimize teicoplanin dosing in critically ill children, including those on CKRT.
methodsData from 26 critically ill children (12 with CKRT) receiving the standard dosing regimen were analysed. In total, 172 teicoplanin concentration measurements from plasma, pre- and post-filter ports were modelled simultaneously using NONMEM 7.4. Simulations were conducted to assess the target attainment (Cmin = 10 mg/L and AUC24/MIC > 800 h) of the current standard dosing regimen and of different alternative dosing regimens.
resultsA two-compartment model was selected. Weight significantly affected renal clearance and volume of distribution of the central compartment, while filter surface area affected haemofilter clearance. Only 16 patients (59%) achieved a Cmin of >10 mg/L with the standard dosing regimen, and only 1 achieved the target AUC/MIC. Based on simulation results, 3 × 15 mg/kg q12h + 10 mg/kg q24h (CKRT) and 3 × 15 mg/kg q12h + 15 mg/kg q24h (no CKRT) could be better alternative regimens.
conclusionsThis population model is a good proof of concept to develop modelling approaches that could help in an individualized dosing approach that needs to be adopted in critically ill paediatric patients. The standard paediatric dosage for teicoplanin could be insufficient for optimal exposure, and higher doses may benefit both CKRT and non-CKRT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.