Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39846703›Full record

ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Co-Pilot for Primary Care in Diagnosing and Recommending Treatments for Depression?

Inbar Levkovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Inbar LevkovichFaculty of Education, Tel-Hai Academic College, Upper Galilee 2208, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-3889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression poses significant challenges to global healthcare systems and impacts the quality of life of individuals and their family members. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have had a transformative impact on the diagnosis and treatment of depression. These innovations have the potential to significantly enhance clinical decision-making processes and improve patient outcomes in healthcare settings. AI-powered tools can analyze extensive patient data-including medical records, genetic information, and behavioral patterns-to identify early warning signs of depression, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy. By recognizing subtle indicators that traditional assessments may overlook, these tools enable healthcare providers to make timely and precise diagnostic decisions that are crucial in preventing the onset or escalation of depressive episodes. In terms of treatment, AI algorithms can assist in personalizing therapeutic interventions by predicting the effectiveness of various approaches for individual patients based on their unique characteristics and medical history. This includes recommending tailored treatment plans that consider the patient's specific symptoms. Such personalized strategies aim to optimize therapeutic outcomes and improve the overall efficiency of healthcare. This theoretical review uniquely synthesizes current evidence on AI applications in primary care depression management, offering a comprehensive analysis of both diagnostic and treatment personalization capabilities. Alongside these advancements, we also address the conflicting findings in the field and the presence of biases that necessitate important limitations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDepressionAlgorithmsHumansPrecision MedicinePrimary Health Careartificial intelligence (AI)depressionethical considerationsmental healthpersonalized therapyprimary carepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID39846703
PMCPMC11755475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.