ArticleSICOT-J2025
Clinical outcomes and long-term efficacy of high tibial osteotomy in treating knee instability: An updated systematic review.
Article in SICOT-J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reflections on SICOT-J Volume 11 (2025).SICOT-J · 2026Article
- Osteoarthritis: multitissue pathology, molecular mechanisms, clinical management, and emerging precision and regenerative therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKnee joint stability is influenced by force distribution and ligament structures. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) treats knee deformities and redistributes load, reducing further invasive procedures. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is a well-established procedure for addressing knee instability, particularly in cases involving ligament deficiencies such as ACL and PCL insufficiencies. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and long-term efficacy of HTO in improving knee stability and function.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE, and ProQuest databases for studies published between 2000 and June 2024. Eligible studies included human subjects with at least six months of follow-up and focused on HTO for knee instability. Exclusion criteria included animal studies, non-knee joint studies, and reviews. Data on patient demographics, follow-up duration, subjective and objective outcomes, and complications were extracted.
resultsOut of 536 studies identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 303 patients. Combining HTO with ACL or PCL reconstruction significantly improved both subjective instability and objective measures, including Lachman and Pivot Shift test grades. Patient satisfaction was high, and functional scores such as Lysholm and Tegner improved markedly. The incidence of complications was low, with minor issues such as infections and delayed union, and no reported graft failures.
conclusionHTO, particularly when combined with ligament reconstruction, effectively treats knee instability due to ACL or PCL deficiency. The procedure demonstrates strong mid- to long-term outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low rate of complications. It remains a viable option for patients with knee instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.