Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39846460›Full record

ReviewPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2025

7. Cervical facet pain: Degenerative alterations and whiplash-associated disorder.

M D Hellinga, M van Eerd, M P Stojanovic, S P Cohen, J de Andrès Ares, J W Kallewaard, K Van Boxem, J Van Zundert, M Niesters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. 7. Cervical facet pain: Degenerative alterations and whiplash-associated disorder.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M D HellingaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M van EerdDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1959-1715
M P StojanovicDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
S P CohenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J de Andrès AresPain Unit Hospital Universitario La Paz-(Anesthesiology), Madrid, Spain.
J W KallewaardAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Velp, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7681-1796
K Van BoxemDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7355-9524
J Van ZundertDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-2036
M NiestersDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPain from the cervical facet joints, either due to degenerative conditions or due to whiplash-related trauma, is very common in the general population. Here, we provide an overview of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical facet-related pain with special emphasis on interventional treatment techniques.

methodsA literature search on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical facet joint pain and whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. All relevant literature was retrieved and summarized.

resultsFacet-related pain is typically diagnosed based on history and physical examination of the patients, combined with a diagnostic block (eg, with local anesthetic) of the medial branches innervating the joints. There is no additive value for imaging techniques to diagnose cervical facet pain, but imaging may be used for procedure planning. First-line therapy for pain treatment includes focused exercise, graded activity, and range-of-motion training. Pharmacological treatment may be considered for acute facet joint pain; however, for chronic facet joint pain, evidence for pharmacological treatment is lacking. Considering the lack of evidence for treatment with botulinum toxin, intra-articular steroid injections, or surgery, these interventions are not recommended. Diagnostic blocks are not considered a viable treatment option, though some patients may experience a prolonged analgesic effect. Long-term analgesia (>6 months) has been observed for radiofrequency treatment of the medial branches.

conclusionsCervical facet pain is diagnosed based on history, physical examination, and a diagnostic block of the medial branches innervating the painful joints. Conservative management, including exercise therapy, is the first line of treatment. When conservative management does not result in adequate improvement of pain, radiofrequency treatment of the medial branches should be considered, which often results in adequate pain relief.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeNeck PainWhiplash InjuriesZygapophyseal JointHumansPain Managementcervical facet jointcervical painneck painradiofrequency treatmentwhiplash‐associated disorder

Identifiers

PMID39846460
PMCPMC11756046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.