ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Measuring the effects of motion corruption in fetal fMRI.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional brain connectivity from the fetal period through infancy: A narrative review of resting-state fMRI studies.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Measuring the effects of motion corruption in fetal fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Irregular and unpredictable fetal movement is the most common cause of artifacts in in utero functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), affecting analysis and limiting our understanding of early functional brain development. The accurate detection of corrupted functional connectivity (FC) resulting from motion artifacts or preprocessing, instead of neural activity, is a prerequisite for reliable and valid analysis of FC and early brain development. Approaches to address this problem in adult data are of limited utility in fetal fMRI. In this study, we evaluate a novel technique for robust computational assessment of motion artifacts, and the quantitative comparison of regression models for artifact removal in fetal FC analysis. It exploits the association between dynamic FC and non-stationarity of fetal movement, to detect residual noise. To validate our motion artifact detection technique in detail, we used a parametric generative model for neural events and fMRI blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal. We conducted a systematic evaluation of 11 commonly used regression models in a sample of 70 fetuses with gestational age of 19-39 weeks. Results demonstrate that the proposed method has better accuracy in identifying corrupted FC compared to methods designed for adults. The technique, suggests that censoring, global signal regression and anatomical component-based regression models are the most effective models for compensating motion. The benchmarking technique, and the generative model for realistic fetal fMRI BOLD enables investigators conducting in utero fMRI analysis to effectively quantify the impact of fetal motion and evaluate alternative regression strategies for mitigating this impact. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/cirmuw/fetalfMRIproc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.