Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Early Neurologic Deterioration and Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet in Anterior Versus Posterior Circulation Stroke.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02869009 (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild-Moderate Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild-Moderate Ischemic Stroke (ATAMIS): a Parallel Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Prospective Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world outcomes following dual antiplatelet therapy in mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke with anterior versus posterior circulation infarct: a READAPT study propensity matched analysis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnterior circulation stroke (ACS) differs from posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in several aspects. We hypothesize that the risk of early neurologic deterioration (END) and its responses to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone may be different between stroke territories. METHODS AND
resultsThis was a prespecified post hoc analysis of ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial and included patients with definite infarct location who were classified into ACS and PCS according to stroke territory. Primary outcome was occurrence of END at 7 days, defined as ≥2-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline. We compared the treatment effects of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone in each stroke territory. From 3000 patients, 2431 eligible patients (1780 with ACS [910 assigned into clopidogrel plus aspirin and 870 assigned into aspirin alone] and 651 with PCS [371 assigned into clopidogrel plus aspirin and 280 assigned into aspirin alone]) were included. Median age was 66 years and 35.1% were women. The occurrence of END was higher in ACS than PCS (6.8% versus 3.8%,
conclusionsOur study demonstrated END was higher in acute mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke with anterior circulation, who derived more benefit from clopidogrel plus aspirin than aspirin alone. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02869009.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.