Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39846293›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Semantic abnormalities in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A natural language processing approach.

Young Tak Jo, Yeon Ho Joo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Young Tak JoDepartment of Psychiatry, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gangdong-gu, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0561-2503
Yeon Ho JooDepartment of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe diagnostic boundaries between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are controversial due to the ambiguity of psychiatric nosology. From this perspective, it is noteworthy that formal thought disorder has historically been considered pathognomonic of schizophrenia. Given that human thought is partially based on language, we can hypothesize that alterations in language may help differentiate between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

methodIn this exploratory study, we employed natural language processing techniques to identify differences in language abnormalities between patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The KoBERT and KoGPT language models were used to determine sentence acceptability, assessing how natural and therefore acceptable a given sentence is to the general population. In addition, semantic word networks were constructed for each group, and network measures were compared.

resultsPatients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder used less acceptable sentences than controls.

conclusionsPatients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder showed significant differences in sentence acceptability as calculated by the language model, as well as in the network metrics estimated by semantic network analysis. Thus, language abnormalities may represent surrogate markers of thought disorders and help differentiate between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderNatural Language ProcessingSchizophreniaSemanticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbipolar disorderlanguagenatural language processingSchizophreniathought disorder

Identifiers

PMID39846293
PMCPMC11758559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.