ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2025
Adaptive functioning in children and young adults with monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome sequencing reveals high diagnostic yield in children with severe sporadic developmental language disorder.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Adaptive functioning in children and young adults with monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo examine the adaptive behaviour profiles of children with monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) to determine whether syndrome-specific or transdiagnostic approaches provide a better understanding of the adaptive behavioural phenotypes of these NDDs.
methodThis cross-sectional study included parents and caregivers of 243 (48% female) individuals (age range = 1-25 years; mean = 8 years 10 months, SD = 5 years 8 months) with genetically confirmed monogenic NDDs (CDK13, DYRK1A, FOXP2, KAT6A, KANSL1, SETBP1, BRPF1, and DDX3X). Parents and caregivers completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition to assess communication, daily living, socialization, and motor skills.
resultsLinear regression models comparing mean adaptive behaviours between monogenic NDDs, adjusting for the presence of intellectual disability, revealed few group differences. Children with variants in BRPF1 or KANSL1 had better adaptive behaviour skills compared to children with variants in CDK13, DDX3X, DYRK1A, and KAT6A, although group differences varied across domains. A latent profile analysis showed compelling evidence for a five-profile model. These profiles were homogeneous, with similar delays across the subdomain scores in each profile. Additionally, each monogenic NDD was represented in each profile, with a few exceptions.
interpretationTransdiagnostic approaches to understand adaptive behaviour in monogenic NDDs provide a better understanding of individual strengths and challenges, enabling more targeted support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.