ArticleACR open rheumatology2025
Increasing Contraception Documentation in an Academic Rheumatology Clinic: A Quality Improvement Approach.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building a Framework for Sexual and Reproductive Health Care in the Rheumatology Context: Content and Approaches.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis quality improvement initiative aimed to increase the rate of provider screening and documentation of contraception use for reproductive-aged women seen in an academic rheumatology fellows' clinic to >50% by 24 weeks, with sustained improvement at one year.
methodsWith a multidisciplinary team, we devised and implemented six interventional cycles over 24 weeks informed by key stakeholder survey responses. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of eligible visits with contraception information documented in the structured electronic health record field. The smoking status documentation rate was tracked as a balancing measure, and the percentage of contraception documenters who were non-medical doctor (MD) clinical staff, the target group for the intervention, was tracked as a process measure. Outcome, process, and balancing measures were assessed every two weeks over one year.
resultsOver 24 weeks, the rate of contraception documentation increased from 11% to 54% (median 30%), and the median smoking status documentation rate was 88% (68%-97% range); the median rate of non-MD clinical staff documenters was 92% (70%-100% range). Interventions included an introductory educational session with documentation instruction and scripts to guide screening, email reminders from nursing leadership, and interim educational sessions. At one year, the contraception documentation rate was sustained at 50%.
conclusionA multicycle educational intervention led to an increase in the contraception documentation rate from 11% to 54% for reproductive-aged women seen in an academic rheumatology fellows' clinic over 24 weeks, with sustained improvement at one year. Future interventions will focus on increasing contraception counseling and referrals for patients in rheumatology clinics who were high risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.