ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2024
Minimising inhaled corticosteroids for COPD.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Therapeutic Letter considers the evidence for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Drug therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, enhance functional capacity and prevent exacerbations, but has not consistently shown to reduce mortality or improve quality of life based on randomised trials.Inhaled corticosteroids have shown limited benefits for COPD symptoms and exacerbations but increased risks of serious harms. Guidelines recommend limiting ICS to severe COPD and only for repeated exacerbations. Studies show withdrawing ICS can be done safely for stable COPD patients with infrequent exacerbations, especially those with lower eosinophil counts. Provincial, national and international guidelines now recommend limiting ICS prescriptions to severe COPD stages. Long-term ICS use may lead to serious side effects, including pneumonia and fractures. Initial COPD therapy should focus on short-acting bronchodilators, not ICS. Adding long-acting bronchodilators is recommended before considering ICS because of limited benefits and risks of serious harms. For persistent symptoms, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) are recommended, with the addition of ICS reserved for those with repeated exacerbations and severe COPD. Deprescribing ICS can be considered in clinically stable patients, particularly for those with infrequent exacerbations and mild COPD. When applicable, tapering ICS over several months is advised for patients with elevated eosinophil counts. Overall, the risks of serious harms from ICS typically outweigh their limited benefits for mild COPD patients in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.