ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Research on atrial fibrillation diagnosis in electrocardiograms based on CLA-AF model.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- R-R Interval Histogram-Based Deep Learning for 3-Class Atrial Fibrillation Screening in Garment-Type Wearable Holter Electrocardiogram Monitoring: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- An Intelligent IoT-Compatible Arrhythmia Detection System Using a Hybrid Vision Transformer-LSTM Framework.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Article
- Wearable Flexible Sensors for Cardiovascular Disease Monitoring.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Challenges in the Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Ischemia Using End-to-End Deep Learning and the Electrocardiogram: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the primary method for diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF), but interpreting ECGs can be time-consuming and labour-intensive, which deserves more exploration. Methods and results: We collected ECG data from 6590 patients as YY2023, classified as Normal, AF, and Other. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), and Attention construct the AF recognition model CNN BiLSTM Attention-Atrial Fibrillation (CLA-AF). The generalization ability of the model is validated on public datasets CPSC2018, PhysioNet2017, and PTB-XL, and we explored the performance of oversampling, resampling, and hybrid datasets. Finally, additional PhysioNet2021 was added to validate the robustness and applicability in different clinical settings. We employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to interpret the model's predictions. The F1-score, Precision, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the CLA-AF model on YY2023 are 0.956, 0.970, and 1.00, respectively. Similarly, the AUC on CPSC2018, PhysioNet2017, and PTB-XL reached above 0.95, demonstrating its strong generalization ability. After oversampling PhysioNet2017, F1-score and Recall improved by 0.156 and 0.260. Generalization ability varied with sampling frequency. The model trained from the hybrid dataset has the most robust generalization ability, achieving an AUC of 0.96 or more. The AUC of PhysioNet2021 is 1.00, which proves the applicability of CLA-AF. The SHAP values visualization results demonstrate that the model's interpretation of AF aligns with the diagnostic criteria of AF. Conclusion: The CLA-AF model demonstrates a high accuracy in recognizing AF from ECG, exhibiting remarkable applicability and robustness in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.