ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Randomized clinical trial of peer integrated collaborative care intervention after physical injury.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03569878 (A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of an Information Technology Enhanced Peer-Integrated Collaborative Care Intervention for US Trauma Care Systems), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of an Information Technology Enhanced Peer-Integrated Collaborative Care Intervention for US Trauma Care Systems
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- Integrating survivors with frontline trauma providers: a winning strategy for providers, survivors, and research integrity.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: The goal of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of a peer integrated collaborative care intervention for postinjury outcomes. Methods: Injury survivors ≥18 years of age were screened for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and severe postinjury concerns; screen-positive patients were randomized to the intervention versus enhanced usual care control conditions. The collaborative care intervention included peer support and care management. The intervention also included evidence-based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapeutic elements targeting PTSD. The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted recruitment between March and June 2020; in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the peer component of the intervention went from in-person to virtual delivery. The primary outcomes were PTSD symptoms assessed with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition PTSD checklist, any severe postinjury concerns, and emergency department/inpatient utilization followed over the 12 months postinjury. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with emotional healthcare. Results: A total of 450 patients were randomized to the intervention (n=225) and control (n=225) conditions; 124 patients (28%) were recruited and completed all study assessments prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, while 326 patients (72%) were recruited after and/or had one or more study follow-ups occur postpandemic onset. Mixed model regression revealed no statistically significant comparisons for any of the primary outcomes. In exploratory models that examined the impact of COVID-19, significantly improved PTSD symptoms were present at 3 months pre-COVID-19 relative to post-COVID-19. Intervention patients consistently demonstrated higher satisfaction with emotional aspects of healthcare (F(5,1652)=2.87, p=0.01). Conclusions: The intervention demonstrated no significant improvements in primary outcomes in the intent-to-treat sample. The peer integrated collaborative care intervention contributed to higher patient satisfaction with the emotional aspects of healthcare. Level of evidence: Level II, randomized clinical trial. Trial registration number: NCT03569878.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.