Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845996›Full record

ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

SAFE-GOALS: a protocol for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit.

David Ray Velez, Thomas Dresser Irons, Anthony Brando Opimo, Emily Brown, Doug Foley, Jamie Lynn Velez, Allison G McNickle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. How Long Do We Have? A Retrospective Review of Palliative Extubation in the Burn Unit.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David Ray VelezDepartment of Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-5773
Thomas Dresser IronsDepartment of Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Anthony Brando OpimoUniversity Medical Center of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Emily BrownUniversity Medical Center of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Doug FoleyUniversity Medical Center of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Jamie Lynn VelezUniversity of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Allison G McNickleDepartment of Surgery, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2400-8440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: In critical care, there is often a lack of understanding regarding patient preferences toward end-of-life care. Goals of care discussions are poorly defined and inhibited by clinician apprehension, prognostic uncertainty, and discomfort from both sides. In the delivery of bad news, protocol-based discussions have proven beneficial, yet no such protocol exists for goals of care discussions in the intensive care unit (ICU). We therefore assembled a multidisciplinary team to define a specific protocol dedicated to leading goals of care discussions in the ICU setting. SAFE-GOALS protocol: S: set upA: acknowledgmentF: family understandingE: events of hospital courseG: get to know the patientO: optionsAL: active listening and discussionS: steps going forward. Conclusion: This protocol provides a framework for leading goals of care conversations in the ICU. Specific training should be incorporated and better emphasized in the modern medical education.

Indexed as

educationethicsintensive care unitprotocol

Identifiers

PMID39845996
PMCPMC11749792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.