Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845985›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025

Machine learning applications in placenta accreta spectrum disorders.

Mahsa Danaei, Maryam Yeganegi, Sepideh Azizi, Fatemeh Jayervand, Seyedeh Elham Shams, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi, Reza Bahrami, Ali Masoudi, Amirhossein Shahbazi, Amirmasoud Shiri and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Hematologic markers and machine learning in predicting placenta accreta: A case-control study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mahsa DanaeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam YeganegiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran.
Sepideh AziziShahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research Development Unit, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh JayervandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyedeh Elham ShamsDepartment of Pediatrics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein SharifiDepartment of Cardiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Reza BahramiNeonatal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali MasoudiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Amirhossein ShahbaziStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Amirmasoud ShiriStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Heewa RashnavadiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kazem AghiliDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Rahnamoun Hospital, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Hossein NeamatzadehMother and Newborn Health Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the emerging applications of machine learning (ML) and radiomics in the diagnosis and prediction of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders, addressing a significant challenge in obstetric care. It highlights recent advancements in ML algorithms and radiomic techniques that utilize medical imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound for effective classification and risk stratification of PAS. The review discusses the efficacy of various deep learning models, such as nnU-Net and DenseNet-PAS, which have demonstrated superior performance over traditional diagnostic methods through high AUC scores. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of integrating quantitative imaging features with clinical data to enhance diagnostic accuracy and optimize surgical planning. The potential of ML to predict surgical morbidity by analyzing demographic and obstetric factors is also explored. Emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies to ensure consistent feature extraction and model performance, this review advocates for the integration of radiomics and ML into clinical workflows, aiming to improve patient outcomes and foster a multidisciplinary approach in high-risk pregnancies. Future research should focus on larger datasets and validation of biomarkers to refine predictive models in obstetric care.

Indexed as

Diagnostic MethodsMachine LearningPlacenta Accreta SpectrumPredictive ModelsRadiomicsSurgical Planning

Identifiers

PMID39845985
PMCPMC11751428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.