SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2024
Best evidence summary for nutritional management of cancer patients with chyle leaks following surgery.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Best evidence summary for the rational use of parenteral nutrition in hospitalized cancer patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Chylous Ascites: A Rare Initial Presentation of High-Grade Follicular Lymphoma.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2026Article
- Summary of the best evidence for non-pharmacological interventions for dyslipidemia in patients with coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chyle leaks (CL) is a significant postoperative complication following lymph node dissection in cancer patients. Persistent CK is related to a series of adverse outcomes. Nutritional management is considered an effectively strategy that treat CL. However, the existing evidence on nutritional management for this patient cohort fails to provide actionable clinical guidance. Aim: This study was aimed to establish an evidence-based framework for nutritional management, offering reliable basis for clinical nursing practice. Methods: Utilizing the "6S" mode, we conducted a systematic search of UpToDate, BMJ, Best Practice, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Center for Evidence-Based Health Care Database, National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), World Health Organization, Medlive, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN), European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, China Biology Medicine (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for all evidence on the nutritional management of postoperative coeliac leakage in cancer patients. This search included guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensus, clinical decision-making, recommended practices, systematic evaluations or Meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and class experiments. The search timeframe was from the library's establishment to June 2024. Quality assessment of the literature was completed independently by two researchers with professional evidence-based training and expert advice, and evidence was extracted and summarized for those that met the quality criteria. Results: A total of 13 articles were included in the analysis, comprising two expert consensus, one guideline, one class of experimental studies, seven systematic evaluations, and two clinical decisions. We summarized 22 pieces of evidence across five categories: nutritional screening, assessment, and monitoring, timing of nutritional therapy, methods and approaches to nutritional therapy, nutrient requirements, and dietary modification strategies. Conclusion: This study presents key evidence for nutritional management in cancer patients with CL post-surgery, emphasizing nutritional screening, assessment, timing and methods of therapy, and dietary adjustment strategies. It emphasized the necessity of thorough screening tools for the assessment of nutritional condition, and the benefits of early enteral feeding. A multidisciplinary team approach is vital for conducting personalized dietary, while sustained nutritional support, dietary fat restrictions, and medium-chain triglycerides enhance nutrient absorption. Consistent monitoring of chylous fluid output and timely dietary adjustments are crucial for improving patient outcomes and recovery. Systematic review registration: http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn/registerResources, identifier ES20244732.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.