Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845858›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023

Improving the preoperative assessment of older adults considering surgery: The need for a structured curriculum during surgery residency.

Samuel M Miller, Claire Morton, Kimberly M Glerum, Erin M White, Robert D Becher, Peter S Yoo, Ronnie A Rosenthal, Mary E Tinetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel M MillerDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Claire MortonDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Kimberly M GlerumDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Erin M WhiteDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Robert D BecherDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Peter S YooDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Ronnie A RosenthalDepartment of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.
Mary E TinettiDepartment of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT 06520-8088, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over half of surgeries in the United States are performed on older adults. The aims of this study were to quantify geriatric-relevant discussion topics and assessments during the consent process and to assess the need for a structured approach to consent older patients. Methods: General surgery residents at a single institution answered questions about content of the informed consent process and preoperative assessment in adult and geriatric (> 65) patients. Questions addressed frequency of geriatric- relevant discussions, assessments and consultations for the two patient groups. Results: Part 1 was completed by 66/75 residents (88.0%). Most residents received training in informed consent during medical school or residency (95%). Common avenues for training were direct observation of attending surgeons or senior residents (85%), followed by didactic teaching (47%) and independent reading (30%). Only three residents (two PGY1s and one PGY2) reported receiving specific training in how to achieve informed consent in older patients. Part 2 was completed by 47/56 eligible residents (83.9%). Postoperative expectations (85.1%), living situation (53.2%), postoperative goals (53.2%), and advanced directives (42.6%) were most commonly discussed. Cognitive testing (19.1%), geriatrics consults (14.9%), and frailty scores (4.3%) were rarely addressed. There were no correlations between discussion of this information with resident age, level in residency, self-identified gender, or self-identification as a member of a racial or ethnic minority. Conclusions: Geriatric-relevant topics and assessments occurred sporadically during the resident-led informed consent process and were more common with senior residents. Training in geriatric relevant informed consent rarely occurs during residency. These results, if generalizable across surgical training sites, highlight the need for a structured curriculum to address geriatric-relevant perioperative concerns.

Indexed as

Informed consentOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID39845858
PMCPMC11750005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.