ArticleSurgery in practice and science2023
A modern-day research model for large academic institutions: A fellow-based solution.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the aftermath of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 becoming pass/fail, research has become a more important component of residency applications. Time is a finite resource, and clinicians, both academic and private practice, struggle to balance research within their schedules. We aim to provide a model to produce impactful research efficiently. Methods: We describe our experience in developing a modern-day research model that was developed to create a robust research program at our institution. A grassroots initiative of researchers, including academicians, a burn fellow, residents, and students, has become a research model that large academic institutions should leverage for efficiency and productivity. Results: What began as one attending, one fellow, four medical students, and one burn center grew in several months to include over 170 students, a student organization, five fellows from varying specialties, seven residents, and 22 faculty members in 15 disciplines. In addition, our collaboration includes interdisciplinary research involving other institutional departments such as mathematics, medical education, biostatistics, industrial engineering, and computer engineering. Tenably, we have over 150 projects in the works, 22 publications, 47 podium presentations, 47 poster presentations, and over 150 approved IRB proposals, along with four grants- all in 16 months. Discussion: As we move into the era of the ungraded medical student, the importance of research experience and productivity is rising. Academic institutions that adapt to this change in the medical education landscape have the opportunity to increase innovation and their institution's contributions to academic medicine while producing well-rounded graduates with skills vital to efficacious patient care. Conclusion: This research model allows for interdisciplinary collaboration and efficient research productivity in large academic institutions. We aim to inspire other institutions to consider implementing a similar research model and continue to contribute to the innovation and advancement of medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.