Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845806›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2025

Phα1β interaction with the Kv11.1 potassium channel in HEK293 cells transfected with the human ERG channel.

João B Calixto, Adara Aurea Dos Santos, Juliano Ferreira, Alessandra Hubner Souza, Célio José de Castro, Marcus Vinicius Gomez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

João B CalixtoCenter for Innovation and Pre-Clinical Trials (CIEnP), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-7153
Adara Aurea Dos SantosCenter for Innovation and Pre-Clinical Trials (CIEnP), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2309-4890
Juliano FerreiraFederal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9562-0602
Alessandra Hubner SouzaSchool of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais (FCM-MG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-2765
Célio José de CastroSchool of Health Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-4471
Marcus Vinicius GomezSchool of Health Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6082-930X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study examines the impact of Phα1β, a spider peptide derived from the venom of Methods: To assess hERG potassium channel inhibition, we utilized the FLIPR® Potassium Assay, a commercially available kit. The assay involved testing the effects of Phα1β alongside the well-established hERG potassium channel blocker dofetilide, which served as a positive control. The viability of HEK-293 cells was assessed using the colorimetric MTT reduction test (3-(4, dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide), whereby viable cells reduce the MTT salt, forming a formazan complex within their mitochondria, as previously described. Results: Phα1β was tested at concentrations of 56, 225, 450, and 900 pMol, resulting in a discreet inhibition of hERG potassium channel activity at higher concentrations, approximately 13.47%, with an IC Conclusion: Our findings indicate that even at high concentrations, Phα1β does not impede the functionality of the hERG potassium channel nor affect cell viability.

Indexed as

analgesiccell viabilityDofetilideHEK293-hERGhERG channel interactionKv11.1 potassium channelPhα1β

Identifiers

PMID39845806
PMCPMC11748958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.