ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2024
Interpreting Lung Cancer Health Disparity between African American Males and European American Males.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a predominant cause of cancer-related deaths, with notable disparities in incidence and outcomes across racial and gender groups. This study addresses these disparities by developing a computational framework leveraging explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to identify both patient- and cohort-specific biomarker genes in lung cancer. Specifically, we focus on two lung cancer subtypes, Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LUSC), examining distinct racial and sex-specific cohorts: African American males (AAMs) and European American males (EAMs). This study innovatively structures classification tasks based on disease conditions rather than racial labels to avoid race-specific imbalance. We constructed four classification tasks- one three-class problem (LUAD-LUSC-HEALTHY) and three two-class problems (LUAD-LUSC, LUAD-HEALTHY, LUSC-HEALTHY)- to interpret the disease behavior of the patients in terms of genes and pathways. This methodology allows a LUAD or LUSC patient to be analyzed via multiple classifications, yielding robust disparity information for every patient. This preliminary work reports the disparity information for LUAD only. Utilizing Transcriptome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) projects, we processed samples for LUAD, LUSC, and HEALTHY cohorts. We applied machine learning models, including convolutional neural network (CNN), logistic regression (LR), naïve Bayesian classifier (NB), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for the classification. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP)-based interpretation of the best performing classification model uncovered cohort-specific genes and pathways related to health disparities between LUAD-AAM and LUAD-EAM cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.