Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845755›Full record

ArticleActa endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)

SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY MARKERS - PROGNOSTIC VALUE IN OVARIAN CANCER.

A L Dinca, A Diaconu, R D Birla, B I Coculescu, V G Dinca, I S Tudorache, L Stoica, C Marica, E C Coculescu, E Panaitescu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A L DincaTitu Maiorescu University, Faculty of Medicine.
A Diaconu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine.
R D Birla"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine.
B I Coculescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing.
V G DincaTitu Maiorescu University, Faculty of Medicine.
I S TudoracheTitu Maiorescu University, Faculty of Medicine.
L Stoica"Politehnica" University, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science.
C Marica"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine.
E C Coculescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy.
E Panaitescu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine.
G ManoleRomanian Academy of Medical Sciences.
S M Constantinoiu"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic inflammation is associated with different cancers, and is identified as a key pathogenic mechanism in ovarian cancer. The purpose of our study was to evaluate systemic inflammation markers, as predictive and prognostic factors, in ovarian cancer patients with initial surgical treatment. Subjects and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 60 ovarian cancer patients with primary cytoreduction surgery, between 2010-2018, with a follow-up period of at least one year. We analyzed systemic inflammation markers and their correlations with the clinical, paraclinical, tumor characteristics, or treatment particularities, and evaluated them as prognostic factors for overall survival. Results: In the univariate analysis, no statistically significantly differences were observed, by correlating the systemic inflammation markers with age, reproductive status, FIGO stage, or type of cytoreduction. Higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were statistically significant associated with deceased patients, and lower lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) had statistical significance for living patients. For the patients in the group, the increase of NLR, as well as of PLR leads to the increased risk of death, and the increase of LMR leads to the decrease of this risk. In the multivariate regression analysis, the increase of NLR determined an increased risk of death by 9.7%, and for LMR a reduced risk of death by 46.9%. Conclusions: Systemic inflammation markers had no statistical significance correlated with age, reproductive status, FIGO stage, serous cancer type, or type of cytoreduction but only with overall survival. NLR is an independent risk factor, while LMR is an independent protection factor as well as optimal cytoreduction.

Indexed as

inflammatory markerslymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR)neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)ovarian cancerplatelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)survival prognosis

Identifiers

PMID39845755
PMCPMC11750215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.