Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845744›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

The Importance of Antimicrobial Strategies Associated with Clinical Cure and Increased Microbiological Eradication in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections and High Risk of Relapse.

José Medina Polo, Jose Luis Alfonso Sánchez, Jorge Arca-Suárez, Ángel Estella, Pablo González, Martí Blasco, Alicia Gil, Leonor Del Mar Periañez Párraga, Francisco Javier Membrillo de Novales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

José Medina PoloServicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Jose Luis Alfonso SánchezServicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge Arca-SuárezServicio de Microbiología and Instituto de Investigación Biomédica A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, Ciber de Enfermedades Infecciosas CIBERINFEC, A Coruña, Spain.
Ángel EstellaUnidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Jerez, Spain.
Pablo GonzálezOmakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Martí BlascoOmakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia GilOmakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Leonor Del Mar Periañez PárragaServicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Membrillo de NovalesUnidad NRBQ-Infecciosas, Sección de Infecciosas, Unidad de Aislamiento de Alto Nivel, Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are serious, potentially life-threatening infections that occur in patients with an increased disease progression risk. Antimicrobial resistance represents an important health issue worldwide, contributing to relapses, which can generate further resistances. It is necessary to clarify the role of microbiological eradication as an additional objective in the management of cUTIs. Some publications suggest that relapses relate to insufficient bacterial suppression in the urinary tract. This study focuses on generating a consensus on how patients with cUTIs would benefit from effective antimicrobial agents associated with higher rates of bacterial eradication. Methods: The nominal group technique was followed: systematic literature review, development of a questionnaire, expert panel meeting to discuss results, individual review of draft consensus document, and expert panel meeting to discuss final views and finalise the consensus document. Key findings and limitations: Experts identified risk factors for cUTIs (patients with a higher risk of relapse, physiological obstruction of urinary tract, immune suppression, and previous relapse), and patients who would benefit most from a therapeutic strategy combining clinical cure and aim for microbiological eradication. While experts agreed that the scientific evidence discourages repetition of urine cultures after treatment, they proposed recommendations to prioritise antibiotics with higher evidence of microbiological eradication and close follow-up in patients with a higher risk of relapse, considering any symptoms appearing following clinical cure of the cUTI. Conclusions and clinical implications: Selection of active antimicrobial agents associated with increased microbiological eradication should be prioritised in patients with cUTIs and a high risk of relapse. Patient summary: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) occur in patients with an increased risk of disease progression or are caused by multidrug-resistant uropathogens. Antimicrobial resistance is of concern as it can result in relapses. Antimicrobial therapeutic strategies associated with increased microbiological eradication in cUTI patients with a high risk of relapse are crucial to prevent relapses and development of antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Complicated urinary tract infectionsConsensus documentMicrobiological eradication

Identifiers

PMID39845744
PMCPMC11750509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.