ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Xpert Bladder Cancer Detection in Emergency Setting Assessment (XESA Project): A Prospective, Single-centre Trial.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Xpert bladder cancer detection and monitor in urothelial carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Urinary Extracellular Vesicles for High-Precision Bladder Cancer Subtyping and Prognosis.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- The GreenBladder Study: Early Detection of Bladder Cancer in Greenland Using a Urinary Biomarker.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of FGFR3, TP53 Mutation and Urinary Biomarkers in Urothelial Carcinoma in Pakistani Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Urinary extracellular vesicles for high-precision bladder cancer subtyping and prognosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Bladder cancer (BC) represents a significant health care challenge and is frequently detected during evaluations for haematuria in emergency departments (EDs). Our aim was to evaluate the clinical performance and economic implications of the Xpert BC Detection (BCD) test for patients presenting to the ED with haematuria to address the pressing need for more efficient and accurate diagnostic tools in this setting. Methods: We conducted a prospective single-centre observational study in the ED of a tertiary university hospital. Patients presenting with gross haematuria as the primary reason for their visit were enrolled. Urine samples collected in the ED were analysed using the Xpert BCD test. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and a cost analysis for the Xpert BCD test in comparison to standard diagnostic methods such as urine cytology (UC) and white-light cystoscopy (WLC). Key findings and limitations: The Xpert BCD test exhibited superior sensitivity to UC, particularly in identifying high-grade tumours. Importantly, Xpert BCD implementation has the potential to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary WLC procedures and streamline diagnostic pathways. The cost analysis also highlighted potential cost savings for Xpert BCD adoption in the ED setting. Conclusions and clinical implications: Our findings underscore the promise of Xpert BCD for revolutionising the diagnostic approach to BC in the ED for patients with gross haematuria. Its greater sensitivity and efficiency mean that Xpert BCD has the potential to improve patient care, optimise resource use, and alleviate the economic burden associated with unnecessary procedures. Patient summary: Xpert Bladder Cancer Detection is a simple urine test that detects the presence of five genes associated with bladder cancer. We found that for patients visiting the emergency department because of blood in their urine, use of this test could save time and money over urine cell analysis (UCA) for ruling out or diagnosing bladder cancer. The test was also more sensitive in detecting higher-grade cancers. More research is needed to confirm our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.