Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845698›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

The use of endoscopic ultrasound in tandem with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline for patients at high risk of choledocholithiasis can help to avoid diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in individuals without ascending cholangitis.

Apichet Sirinawasatien, Jiravit Chanchairungcharoen, Thanapon Yaowmaneerat, Jirat Jiratham-Opas, Kanokpoj Chanpiwat, Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Siriboon Attasaranya, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Jerasak Wannaprasert, Thawee Ratanachu-Ek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Apichet SirinawasatienDepartment of Medicine Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-2977
Jiravit ChanchairungcharoenDepartment of Medicine Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.
Thanapon YaowmaneeratDepartment of Medicine Nanthana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Faculty of Medicine Prince of Songkla University Songkhla Thailand.
Jirat Jiratham-OpasDepartment of Surgery Hatyai Surgical Endoscopic Center Hatyai Hospital Songkhla Thailand.
Kanokpoj ChanpiwatDepartment of Medicine Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.
Tanyaporn ChantarojanasiriDepartment of Medicine Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5781-8696
Siriboon AttasaranyaDepartment of Medicine Nanthana-Kriangkrai Chotiwattanaphan Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Faculty of Medicine Prince of Songkla University Songkhla Thailand.
Kannikar LaohavichitraDepartment of Surgery Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.
Jerasak WannaprasertDepartment of Surgery Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.
Thawee Ratanachu-EkDepartment of Surgery Rajavithi Hospital College of Medicine Rangsit University Bangkok Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Choledocholithiasis is the leading cause of biliary pancreatitis and biliary sepsis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered a minimally invasive treatment for choledocholithiasis. However, diagnostic ERCP should be avoided. We conducted a prospective trial in high-risk choledocholithiasis patients based on the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) 2019 criteria to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the current guideline. Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included 240 consecutive patients. The primary outcome was the performance of the criteria in predicting choledocholithiasis. The secondary outcome was a percentage reduction in diagnostic ERCP when endoscopic ultrasound was used in tandem with ERCP in individuals without ascending cholangitis. Results: The overall criteria revealed a positive common bile duct (CBD) stone in 87.1% of patients. Regarding the diagnostic performance of each criterion, ascending cholangitis had a specificity of 67.7% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.2%; total bilirubin >4 mg/dL and dilated CBD had a specificity of 74.2% and a PPV of 55.6%; and CBD stone on ultrasound/cross-sectional imaging had a specificity of 58.1% and a PPV of 89.2%. Of the 138 patients without ascending cholangitis who met the other two high-risk criteria and were sent for EUS first, 21 cases (15.2%) were able to avoid a diagnostic ERCP. Conclusions: The current ASGE 2019 criteria yield acceptable choledocholithiasis diagnostic accuracy. Using endoscopic ultrasound to confirm CBD stones before ERCP can help almost half of patients with the specific condition of total bilirubin >4 mg/dL and dilated CBD to avoid diagnostic ERCP.

Indexed as

ascending cholangitischoledocholithiasiscommon bile duct stoneendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyendoscopic ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39845698
PMCPMC11751624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.