Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845650›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2024

Challenges in diagnosing polyethylene glycol and polysorbate 80 allergies: implications for allergic reactions in COVID-19 mRNA vaccination program: experience from Qatar.

Sami Aqel, Sherin Thalappil, Asaad Imameldin, Dalal Mudawi, Muna Al Maslamani, Abdullatif Al-Khal, Hassan Mobayed, Maryam Ali Al-Nesf, Tayseer Ibrahim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Drug Excipients. Necessary, but not Harmless].Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sami AqelAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Sherin ThalappilAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Asaad ImameldinAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Dalal MudawiAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Muna Al MaslamaniCommunicable Disease Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Abdullatif Al-KhalCommunicable Disease Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Hassan MobayedAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Maryam Ali Al-NesfAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Tayseer IbrahimAllergy and Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccination has been a key intervention in reducing the severity of symptoms; however, concerns about vaccine safety, particularly regarding allergic reactions, arose early on. Healthcare workers faced the challenge of addressing these concerns to ensure safe vaccine administration. This study aimed to review the practical aspects of using allergy skin testing for COVID-19 vaccine excipients in patients with a history of allergic reactions developed following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who reported allergic reactions after the COVID-19 vaccine and underwent allergy skin testing for COVID-19 vaccine excipients in the Adult Allergy and Immunology Service at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. The testing protocol, developed based on published data during the pandemic, included skin prick (SPT) and intradermal (ID) testing using medications containing polysorbate 80 and polyethylene glycol (PEG), the primary excipients in the COVID-19 vaccines suspected of triggering allergic responses. Results: Of the 88 patients reviewed, 38 reported different types of allergic reactions following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, with the majority being female. Anaphylaxis was reported in 21.1% of the patients, while the remaining experienced less severe allergic reactions. All patients underwent SPT and ID testing with PEG and polysorbate 80. By SPT, two patients tested positive for PEG and none for polysorbate 80. By ID, seven tested positive for polysorbate 80 and one for PEG. Among patients who experienced anaphylaxis, 50% had positive allergy test results. Twenty-three percent of patients with negative test results could receive additional vaccine doses without adverse reactions. Conclusion: Managing patients with a history of allergic reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine is challenging, as the exact mechanisms and accurate and valid allergy testing are yet to be determined. In our cohort, most patients had mild allergic reactions following vaccination. Excipients' allergy skin testing has helped to reduce vaccine hesitancy despite its questionable utility in clinical practice.

Indexed as

allergy testinganaphylaxisCOVID-19 vaccinesexcipientspolyethylene glycol allergypolysorbate allergyQatar

Identifiers

PMID39845650
PMCPMC11753240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.