ArticleContemporary clinical dentistry
A Critical Review of YouTube Videos on the Socket-shield Technique: A Content-quality Analysis.
Article in Contemporary clinical dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable RoBERTa approach to analyzing panic and anxiety sentiment in oral health education YouTube comments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Trained to care, untrained to share: the integration of social media (#SoMe) education in dental specialty programs: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental students often prefer social media for its accessibility and low cost but must critically evaluate the content before applying it in practice. This study analyzed YouTube content on socket shielding. A new Google account was created to search for "Socket Shield Technique" and "Partial Extraction Therapy." Eligible videos were assessed for quality using the Global Quality (GQ) tool and the DISCERN tool. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Results showed an average of 28.35 likes per video, no dislikes, and substandard content indicated by a DISCERN score of 25.25 ± 2.4 and a GQ score of 1.82 ± 0.38. The study concludes that video content on socket shielding is not reliable, emphasizing the importance of clinical observation and hands-on practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.