ArticleSurgery in practice and science2022
Lymph node yield as a measure of pancreatic cancer surgery quality.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative, Oncological, and Postoperative Endpoints in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Photon-counting CT for pancreatic cancer: advancing precision imaging and virtual surgical navigation.Journal of pancreatology · 2026Review
- Does minimally invasive pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PPPD) triumph over open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (O-PPPD)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evaluated lymph node (ELN) yield has been established as a promising measure of surgical quality. Research has suggested that an ELN of at least 15 in pancreatic cancer patients is associated with improved survival and staging metrics. The aim of this study was to determine what impact a high ELN yield of ≥15 has in a novel population. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients with resectable, non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by pancreatectomy using the National Cancer Database (NCDB 2004-2017). Patients who had <15 nodes examined and those who had ≥15 examined (high ELN) were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with ELN yield. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. Results: A total of 5,930 patients were included; 58% of patients had ≥15 lymph nodes examined. High ELN was associated with significant improvement in overall survival rates (p<0.004) and perioperative outcomes including post-operative stay (p<0.0001), 30-day unplanned readmission (p<0.028), and 90-day mortality (p<0.001). Patients who were treated at facilities with a high procedure-specific surgery volume were more likely to receive high ELN surgeries than those treated at facilities with a low volume (HR = 2.86[95% CI = 2.36-3.47]). Conclusions: An ELN yield of ≥15 was a significant measure of surgical quality in this novel population as it was associated with improvements in survival and perioperative outcomes. However, considerable harvest disparities exist at the facility level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.