Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845608›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2022

What happens after percutaneous cholecystostomy tube for acute calculous cholecystitis?

Nelimar Cruz-Centeno, Gerardo Jovet-Toledo, Carlos Ramirez-Tanchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nelimar Cruz-CentenoDepartment of Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico (PR).
Gerardo Jovet-ToledoDepartment of Statistics, Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System, ACOS for Research and Development Service, San Juan, Puerto Rico (PR).
Carlos Ramirez-TanchezDepartment of Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico (PR).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute cholecystitis is commonly treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, if feasible. However, critically ill patients can be managed with a percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) for biliary drainage. This is a temporizing measure and does not represent a final treatment. We aimed to compare the outcomes of performing an interval cholecystectomy vs. conservative management after PCT placement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with a PCT placed for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) at a single center from October 2010 to March 2015. Results: Ninety-five patients (median age 79 years) underwent PCT placement for ACC. Only 26.3% of patients underwent interval cholecystectomy. The mortality rate within 6 weeks of ACC diagnosis was higher in the non-surgical group but this was not statistically significant. The number of re-admissions and complications of biliary disease was higher in the surgical group before undergoing interval cholecystectomy, specifically, choledocholithiasis (44% vs. 21.4%; Conclusion: The relatively high incidence of biliary complications in the period between PCT placement and cholecystectomy calls for timely cholecystectomy in patients treated with PCT. When feasible, patients with a history of ACC should undergo interval cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

BiliaryCholecystectomyCholecystitisCholecystostomy tube

Identifiers

PMID39845608
PMCPMC11749936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.