ArticleSurgery in practice and science2022
Surgical portfolios: A systematic scoping review.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in Surgical Training in the United Kingdom and Potential Solutions: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Combating Burnout Amongst Residents Through Fostering Resilience: A Systematic Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Evidence-based medicine training in general surgery in the United Kingdom: an exploratory snapshot survey study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- A systematic scoping review of mentor training in medical education between 2000 and 2024.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The impact of death and caring for the dying and their families on surgeons - an AI assisted systematic scoping review.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- The role of patients' stories in medicine: a systematic scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Physician-patient boundaries in palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The need for longitudinal and comprehensive evidenced development of surgical knowledge, skills and attitudes, and the attainment of appropriate competencies have spotlighted portfolio use. Yet variations in structure, content and roles as well as its resource-heavy reputation have limited its impact. The purpose of this study is to map prevailing data on the use of portfolios in postgraduate surgical education to address a lack of e-portfolio use and guide its design and structuring in surgery. Material and methods: A Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review (SSR) (SSR in SEBA) was conducted to map prevailing data. The constructivist ontological approach used allowed for enhanced reflexivity in the analysis and discussion. Results: 13,092 articles were reviewed, 839 full-text articles were evaluated, and 37 articles were included. Concurrent thematic and content analysis revealed similar themes and categories which were the role of portfolios, evaluation of portfolio use, and implementation of e-portfolios. Discussion: Lessons from traditional surgical portfolios can be employed to enhance the design, support and utility of e-portfolios and yet maintain as a balanced trainee-led perspective of their progress. Focused on documenting the trainee's competencies, achievements, experiences, feedback, and reflections, a variety of methods are presently used to assess the reliability, validity, educational impact, acceptability and feasibility of surgical portfolios. The use of e-portfolios, in particular, has been adopted due to its accessibility, portability and convenience. Beyond its flexibility in access, repository and content, e-portfolios offer increased user accessibility, better quality interactions and smoother facilitation, clarification, and feedback. Conclusions: The data in this SSR in SEBA underscores the need for systematic assessment tools to evaluate e-portfolio as well as evaluate the programs as a whole. Further research into training mentors to support e-portfolio use, assess progress and ensure effective oversight of e-portfolios are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.