Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39845575›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

Training healthcare workers and untrained interpreters in remote collaboration amidst COVID-19.

Yvan Leanza, Noelia Burdeus Domingo, Kossigan Kokou-Kpolou, François René De Cotret

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yvan LeanzaSchool of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Noelia Burdeus DomingoFaculty of Arts, Humanities and Communication, International University of Valencia, Spain, and Linguistics and Translation Department, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Kossigan Kokou-KpolouSchool of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
François René De CotretSchool of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In the context of the public health emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec in 2020, remote public service interpreting has become, within a few days, an essential practice for maintaining services to migrants and allophone refugees, a particularly vulnerable population. This study aimed to measure the impact of two training courses on remote collaboration for mediated consultations developed for healthcare workers and untrained interpreters. Methods: A total of 79 healthcare workers and 65 untrained interpreters from the province of Quebec were recruited. They completed the trainings, offered as webinars, and answered the two scales (knowledge and self-efficacy) of the Results: Findings reveal a positive impact immediately after completion and at a three-month follow-up. However, there was no significant enhancement in interpreters' self-efficacy over the medium term. Conclusion: Given their modality (remote) and duration (30 min for healthcare workers and three hours for interpreters), the training courses are both effective and practical to implement. Innovation: This study innovatively promotes interprofessional collaboration in public service interpreting and explores online training's potential to enhance both individual and collective efficacy in the field.

Indexed as

Collective efficacyInterprofessional collaborationPublic service interpretingRemote interpretingSelf-efficacyTraining

Identifiers

PMID39845575
PMCPMC11750570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.