ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Discovering topics and trends in biosecurity law research: A machine learning approach.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-method integrated weighting framework for biosafety risk assessment of infectious substances.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Know your scientist: KYC as biosecurity infrastructure.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Research topic detection in scientific articles using a hybrid BERT integrated telescopic vector tree model with emperor penguin enhanced NSGA II optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Can China's national fitness policy contribute to achieving universal health? Analysis based on the three-dimensional framework.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employed machine learning techniques, specifically Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), to analyze 559 articles on biosecurity legislation from 1996 to 2023. The LDA model identified nine key research topics, including Agricultural Management and Production, Biosafety and Environmental Impact, Biological Invasion and Regulation, Biosecurity Legislation and Prevention, Agriculture and Environmental Relations, Virus Infection and Governance, Health Risk Assessment and Detection, Disease Prevention and Biotechnology, and Policy Control and Research. The findings reveal significant trends: an increasing focus on Biosecurity Legislation and Prevention and a declining interest in Agricultural Management and Production. Geographically, Australia, Canada, and the United States lead in biosecurity research, exhibiting diverse research topics. Journal-level analysis highlights central topics such as Agricultural Management and Production, Biosecurity Legislation and Prevention, and Health Risk Assessment and Detection. This study's use of LDA reduces subjective bias, providing a more objective analysis of global biosecurity legislation literature. The research underscores the importance of expanding geographical scope, integrating advanced machine learning models, adopting interdisciplinary approaches, and assessing policy impacts to enhance biosecurity strategies globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.